BACK TO HOME PAGE

Iron Man Review

by Tim Wassberg

downey-iron

"Iron Man" has had the buzz of a titan, most specifically in range to its star Robert Downey Jr. The movie has its share of cool integrations of graphical intensity. However the reality is based on a predilection of a script that is a little more (or a little less) grounded. It begins in good faith and the structure of showing Tony Stark's transformation is a valid one. The best elements by far are of Downey's interplay with technology using his trademark wit. His style of acting, and perhaps even his improv, work to great avail here. The problem is that when things get highly technical (as in the end fight), it becomes formulaic because the character work becomes secondary to the effects. The problem is also that the supporting characters, despite their enormous talent pool, is at times ill suited with nothing to do. Jeff Bridges plays a dispirited villain but one without structure. Bridges is immersed, that is for sure. His breakdown on Downey in the Malibu house is fairly neat and brings to mind a reverse engineer of his TRON character. However his build up lacks back up. Gwyneth Paltrow is given a thankless female role with no degree of severe backlash. I believe the biggest misstep however was Terrence Howard. He is a very good actor but is stuck saying very blase lines. Granted this is a superhero movie. And as I said, when Downey is by himself, surrounded by the technology, some of the elements are golden because it plays upon that humor and that makes it work. Jon Favreau is a cool guy and I have always enjoyed talking to him. "Elf" had its moments. I really liked the idea and alot of the execution in "Zathura". The problem is that "Iron Man" feels remarkably empty despite its best efforts. Transition is good thing and the picture stays true to its roots in alot of respects. However, in others, it loses its place. Out of 5, I give it a 2.
 
BACK TO HOME PAGE